√ Open Submissions   √ Indexed       √ Single Blind Review

Peer-review policy

Single blind-review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help editors determine whether the manuscript should be published in their journal. The names of the reviewers are hidden from the author. However, the name of the author is made known to the reviewers.

Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by an expert who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates already published work, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. Reviewers will also be asked to indicate how interesting and significant the research is. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More... (hyperlink to https://www.lockss.org )

Malpractice Statement

Our publication ethics and publication malpractice statement is mainly based on the Code of Conduct and Best - Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors (Committee on Publication Ethics, 2011).

Author(S)' Publication Ethics

Before conducting the review process, all articles will be checked using "Turnitin" software to check the plagiarism. If there is a plagiarism, the article will be immediately rejected.

Plagiarism Screening

The peer-review process is at the heart of scientific publishing. As part of XXXX's commitment to protecting the integrity of the scholarly record, XXXX feels a strong obligation to support the scientific community in all aspects of research and publishing ethics.

We invest in many resources to help educate researchers on how to avoid ethical issues, to detect any issues during the editorial process, to support editors in handling publishing ethics allegations and, if necessary, to correct the scholarly record